Council of Pleasanton to Review School Resource Officer and Mental Health Intervention Programs | New
After two public hearings continued several weeks ago, Pleasanton City Council is set to review and vote on proposals related to both the School Resource Officer and Mental Health Intervention pilot programs. their Tuesday evening meeting, from 19h
The board will provide feedback and advice on the policy direction of a pilot mental health intervention program currently in the planning stages, after staff offered to continue their training at the November 2 board meeting.
By sending a licensed mental health clinician on some service calls instead of a uniformed officer, the Pleasanton Police Department aims to “reduce law enforcement response to people facing a mental health crisis.” . About 350 people considered a danger to themselves or to others are placed in psychiatric detention for 72 hours by the PPD each year.
The proposed model allows the city to “take a more conservative approach,” according to staff, who recommended hiring two clinicians – one for youth interventions and another specializing in adult interventions – and an assistant. program to partner with its homeless outreach team, as well as the temporary reassignment of a sergeant to lead the program.
Police dispatch will transfer service calls directly to a clinician if necessary. Clinicians are expected to primarily respond to non-emergency calls and provide support in emergencies “as needed”.
The two-year pilot program, including the hiring of two full-time clinicians and a part-time temporary program assistant, is expected to cost $ 844,462. Last year, city council allocated $ 800.00 from the year-end general fund balance; planned spending in excess of this amount will be included in the 2021-2022 mid-year budget. If approved, the mental health intervention pilot program will launch in January.
At the request of Deputy Mayor Julie Testa, an update to a memorandum of understanding with Pleasanton Unified School District on the SRO program also continued earlier this month. It was not explained, however, why the two programs were postponed until this week.
After George Floyd’s death last year, students, parents, and PUSD staff have said the ORS program needs reform, with some advocating a halt to the 19-year-old program altogether.
A draft memorandum of understanding between the city and the PUSD was unanimously approved at the board meeting on October 28, during which several amendments to the memorandum of understanding were proposed.
The draft memorandum of understanding was “amended to include specific language on access to student records and a definition of de-escalation strategies,” according to a report from city staff. Among the changes are the addition of minor language to the program objectives that refers to building relationships between students and police officers on campus, as well as clarifications on the disclosure of student records to officials. or non-school employees.
The PUSD also recommended expanding the definition of de-escalation on page 8 of the memorandum of understanding to mean “the process of using strategies and techniques to reduce the intensity of a situation, including, but without to this limit, the use of restorative practices, verbal and non-verbal communication techniques and non-confrontational practices to gain control.
While “supporting” changing program goals, city staff said “changing the definition of de-escalation to include restorative practices is problematic,” and instead suggested removing reference to restorative practices and ” Insert the words ‘if possible’ before non-conflicting practices.
If passed, the MOU will expire on June 30, 2024. The program’s operating costs of $ 417,094, including two full-time officers, will be funded by the city.
In other cases
* An employment contract for interim city manager Brian Dolan is due to be approved by council on Tuesday. Starting next month, Dolan will take over as the city seeks a permanent replacement for outgoing city manager Nelson Fialho.
Fialho retires on November 30, after more than 30 years of public service.
The deal proposed by Dolan includes an annual salary of $ 254,095, annual vacation and administrative leave of 25 and 10 days (respectively), an annual contribution of 4.5% to the deferred compensation account, a vehicle provided by the city or a monthly car allowance of $ 400, and “the same medical, retirement, medical, dental, leave and vacation benefits for management / confidential employees.” “
According to the city, Dolan’s pay and benefits as interim city manager “are generally the same as those currently offered to retired city manager Nelson Fialho, except the pay is $ 1,357 lower.” Under the terms of the contract – which goes into effect on December 1 and expires on July 1, 2022 – Dolan has the right to resume his role as deputy city manager when a new city manager is appointed.
Until his recent appointment as interim manager, Dolan had served as Deputy Managing Director for the past six years. Dolan has been with the city since 2008, starting as director of community development and gradually increasing his scope of responsibilities.
An executive search firm the city recently retained will conduct a search for eligible candidates, which is expected to take between four and six months. The city expects to have a new city manager in early 2022, but a possible pay adjustment will be discussed if Dolan remains interim city manager beyond July 1.
* With a big bill for the city’s water treatment and well rehabilitation looming, city council will approve a resolution on Tuesday allowing city staff to apply for up to $ 31.4 million in loans with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB).
The city is currently in the process of designing its PFAS Treatment and Well Rehabilitation Project, which aims to repair or replace existing well facilities and treat city water for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS ). PFAS are unregulated contaminants considered harmful to human health and were detected in three of Pleasanton’s underground wells in 2019.
Project costs are estimated at $ 46 million, of which $ 3.3 million has already been allocated from the Water Operations Fund to cover design costs, leaving $ 42.7 million currently unfunded.
A financing plan approved by the council this summer identified “up to $ 31.4 million to be financed preferably with a loan from the State Revolving Fund (SRF)” from SWRCB. Staff said in a report that the $ 31.4 million “will be a combination of fundraising and settlement products and grant funds, if applicable.”
“Because the city has not secured grants for the project and there has been no settlement related to the ongoing litigation over the PFAS contamination, the financing plan assumes $ 31.4 million dollars will need to be funded through fundraising, ”the staff said. “The current 1.8% SRF loan interest rate is significantly lower than the current 3.2% interest rate for a tax liability.”
Staff added, “Based on current interest rates, the expected impact of the annual debt services associated with an SRF loan on the city’s water rates is approximately $ 9.50 on bi-monthly water bills.
A consulting firm that prepared the design report of the project bases will also help prepare the technical and environmental files required by the State as part of the loan application process.
According to staff, the estimated cost of helping the business is $ 50,000, which will be paid for through capital improvement program funding already approved by the board.